Sunday, 17 June 2018

ERC want Chief to apologise for campaigning for Zanu PF - sue the puppeteer not the puppet P Guramatunhu


“President of the National Council of Chiefs (NCC) Fortune Charumbira is facing jail after failing to comply with a court order that directed him to issue an apology for rallying other chiefs to support the ruling Zanu-PF in this year's elections,” reported Daily News.

“Charumbira was given seven days within which to issue the apology, which expired on Thursday. This followed an application lodged by the Election Resource Centre (ERC).

“In terms of the country's laws, chiefs are not allowed to participate in political activities or to be seen to be pushing the interests of a particular party.”

This is all academic, at the very best; in real terms this is just a classic case of closing the door when the horse has bolted.

We all know that the Chiefs and all the other traditional leaders are a politically compromised lot with no real power except what Zanu PF gives them; puppets in the puppeteer’s hands. The Chiefs and village heads are the government’s representative and land-barons to the communal owned-land, hence the reason rural areas are called communal areas.

These traditional leaders have always used their autocratic powers to kick povo off the land as the ultimate weapon to force povo into a straitjacket. It was the white colonialists did not want the blacks to own any land, this made it easier for the white government to remove blacks from any piece of land without even the “By your leave!”

The Chiefs did not mind being removed from their ancestral land, rich soil with good rainfall, to be resettled in the dry and arid area, as long as their retained their autocratic powers. Only one or two Chiefs objected, notably the late Chief Rekayi Tangwena. The present cosy arrangement in which the traditional leaders are used to impose the dictatorial wishes of national government is a carryover from the colonial days.

President Mnangagwa has distributed brand new twin cab Isuzu trucks to all the country’s 282 Chiefs, down payment for the Chiefs to make sure the rural electorate are kept in their straitjackets, frog marched to attend Zanu PF rallies and then vote for the party. President Mnangagwa was only fulfilling the pledge Robert Mugabe had made to the Chiefs before he was booted out in the November 2017 coup.

Chief Charumbira had assured President Mugabe, when the tyrant promised the trucks, all the Chiefs will campaign for Zanu PF. Why did ERC not charge Mugabe for the blatant vote buying?

Chief Charumbira repeated his promise that the Chiefs will campaign for Zanu PF to President Mnangagwa when the Chiefs received their down payment bribes. Why did ERC not sue President Mnangagwa for bribing the Chiefs to break the constitution stipulating that Chiefs must stay out of party politics?

Even if Chief Charumbira had publicly apologized “for rallying other chiefs to support the ruling Zanu-PF in this year's elections,” ordered by the court. Will was not going to stop the Chiefs campaigning for Zanu PF, given they are all driving around in the new twin cab Isuzu trucks and therefore constantly being reminded why they got the trucks?

The Chiefs are out there campaigning for Zanu PF; they are telling the rural voters that if Zanu PF does not win all those suspected of voting for the opposition will be punished. The rural voters know this is not an empty threat as many rural voters had their home burnt, have been beaten, raped and even murdered in cold blood.

The only rational reason why ERC have pursued this case demanding a public apology from Chief Charumbira is justify the civic group’s own existence. This is just a political gimmick. The problems of ensuring these elections are free, fair and credible is a serious matter demanding serious solutions and not these political gimmicks!

The raft of democratic reforms agreed at the onset of the 2008 GNU were designed to severe the undemocratic control Zanu PF has over ZEC, the Police, the Army and all the other state institutions including the traditional Chiefs and village heads.

The single most important democratic reform in our rural areas must give everyone title deeds to the land and end this communal ownership nonsense!

Why do we need traditional leaders when we have local council too? At least the people have, in theory at least, a say in the later institution and none in the former. People like Chief Charumbira have shown just how corrupt and utterly irrelevant traditional leaders have become. We should completely abolish the chieftainship; all those holding public office must be democratically accountable to the people and elected in free, fair and credible elections. 

It is inconceivable that these elections can ever be free and fair without first implementing the reforms. For the umpteenth time; these elections should not be taking place without first implementing the raft of democratic reforms!

"The ERC will be proceeding using all available remedies to ensure that consequences follow the disregard shown by chief Charumbira. With all due respect to the chief, our chief, my chief, it is unfortunate that he has decided to go down this road,” said ERC director Tawanda Chimhini.

Zimbabwe is in this economic and political hell-hole because we have been stuck for 38 years with a corrupt, incompetent and tyrannical regime that rigged elections to stay in power. If Zanu PF rigs these elections, signs are that is exactly what the party is doing, then there is no hope of getting out of the hole sometime soon. The long-suffering people of Zimbabwe will derive no solace from the courts slapping Chief Charumbira’s wrist for failing to perform the empty gesture of closing the stable door after those pulling the Chiefs, ZEC, Police, etc. puppet strings had deliberately letting the horse out!

6 comments:

  1. ZEC did not tell the truth when they announced that the voters’ roll was ready to be released to the public.

    ZEC will never ever produce a verified voters' roll that is simply not going to happen, even with all the good will in the world there is no way ZEC was ever going to achieve that goal given the voter registration exercise itself was started very late. With no verified voters' roll the Chinese and NIKUV voter riggers will have a field day because they know with no verified voters' roll no one will be able to prove anything!

    It is inconceivable that these elections can ever be free and fair without first implementing the reforms. For the umpteenth time; these elections should not be taking place not without first implementing the raft of democratic reforms!

    ReplyDelete
  2. "We, Zanu PF, dictate where the nation is going," dictated President Mnangagwa. The man is a dictators and all those who think he has changed are being very naive!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Zimbabwe's civic organisations like ERC have been a total waste of time and space and treasure! We are fighting a life and death situation here to ensure Zimbabwe has free and fair elections and instead of engaging the Zanu PF head-on ERC is wasting time pursuing idiots like Chief Charumbira for a public apology that will change nothing of any substance!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Serial flip-flopper and G40 kingpin, Jonathan Moyo, who has been calling for a grand national coalition to beat Zanu-PF candidate Emmerson Mnangagwa in next month's election, seems upset by the huge number of candidates that registered to contest the country's top post and is wishing that some will do the right thing and withdraw.

    After decades of living in total luxury the last 8 months cooked up in some fox-hole in exile must be taking its toll of Professor Moyo. Last week he is the one who was telling us President Mnangagwa is rigging these elections, which is true given that not even one democratic reform is in place.

    If these elections are being rigged what difference will it make whether Mnangagwa cheats one opposition candidate or 123?

    ReplyDelete
  5. To say "Chamisa will win the elections if they are free, fair and credible" and then go on to state why it is impossible for the elections to be free and fair given the failure to produce a verified voters' roll is as wishy-washy as one can get.
    SADC leaders had a clear cut position and advised Morgan Tsvangirai accordingly. "If you take part in next month's elections you will lose; the elections are done!"
    Is Dr Mandaza saying people should take part in these elections because the elections are free, fair and credible? If so then why is he adding the caveats! If the elections are being rigged and yet he still believes that the opposition can still win rigged elections then he should say so.
    What the people of Zimbabwe must understand up front is that those who play any part in these flawed and illegal elections are doing by their very act of attending rallies, registering, standing in the queue to vote (regardless of whether they do so or not) is three key points:
    1) They either believe the elections are free and fair, or they know the elections are flawed and illegal but are taking part regardless, confident they will win rigged elections.

    2) By virtue of taking part in the election the vote is giving credibility to the process and must accept the outcome without complain. The rest of the world has advised not to take any party by taking part the voters are ignoring the advice of outsiders and the outsiders will in turn ignore the people complaining after the elections that elections were rigged.

    3) The international election observers' decision to declare the elections null and void will dependent of whether the elections met the internationally accepted standards for free and fair elections, number one. Number two, they want to see a significant number of Zimbabweans calling for free and fair elections by participating in elections knowing they are not free and fair only proves that one does not want free and fair elections.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The African Union [AU] Observer Mission to Zimbabwe's 2013 harmonised elections in its final report recommended that "the integrity of the voters roll must be assured through greater transparency, accessibility and public communication with strict adherence to the provisions of the relevant statutes of Zimbabwe".

    The AU Observer Mission further highlighted that "to this end, it is recommended that there be greater transparency on; and adequate provisions of logistics and resources to the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission [ZEC] for organising elections as prescribed in the OAU Declaration on the Principles Governing Democratic Elections in Africa (2002)".

    SADC leaders recommended that there should be no elections without first implementing the democratic reforms.

    The question is will the AU and SADC election observers disregard their own stated positions this year?

    ReplyDelete